Featured
December 2, 2018
Mattis: “no smoking gun” tying Crown Prince to Khasoggi killing

By Josh Yasmeh

(LOS ANGELES) Challenging the media consensus on the murdered Saudi dissident, Defense secretary James Mattis said “there is no smoking gun“ linking in the Saudi crown prince with the killing.

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis says many American political leaders and the media have jumped the gun in blaming Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince for the October murder of dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

“Right now, we do not have a smoking gun that the Crown Prince was involved,” Mattis said Saturday.

Mattis was echoing the views of President Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in his speech at the National Defense Forum at the Reagan Library in Simi Valley, California. They are downplaying the CIA’s assessment that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman ordered the murder of Khashoggi.

Khashoggi who joined the Muslim Brotherhood as a youth though his politics changed he remained committed to an Islamist world view “there can be no political reform and democracy in any Arab country without accepting that political Islam is a part of it,” he wrote in a pro-Muslim Brotherhood op-ed published by the Washington Post earlier this year.

The remarks just days after the Senate passed a bipartisan resolution calling for the United States to suspend military support of the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen.

Khashoggi entered the Saudi consulate in Istanbul on October 2nd, 2018 to get divorce papers that would allow him to marry his Turkish fiancée. He was never seen again. After initially denying any involvement in his disappearance, the Saudi government eventually admitted involvement in his murder and the subsequent dismemberment of the body.

The Washington Post has reported that the CIA believes that Mohammad bin Salman, often known by the initial “MbS”, ordered the assassination. But President Trump disputed that account last month, saying that the CIA report  does not say specifically that MbS ordered the attack.

On Saturday, Mattis suggested that further investigation was necessary to determine what exactly happened to Khashoggi.

“We need to explore all aspects of the murder,” Mattis said.

Mattis also echoed Trump in arguing that crime should not define U.S.-Saudi relations. “Accountability of the murder of Khashoggi stands alone” from the administration’s other policy considerations, namely its national security interests and bilateral arms sales relationships.

 Photo of Mattis with Trump in 2017.

Emphasizing Iran’s disruptive in the Middle East, Mattis asserted the importance of advancing a robust U.S.-Saudi partnership to counter emerging threats from the region’s preeminent Shiite power, including potential threats from nuclear proliferation and proxy warfare. This includes continued support for Saudi Arabia’s proxy war in Yemen.

To date an ongoing war in Yemen has killed thousands of civilians as a result of a nearly three-year long bombing campaign. The death toll is a consequence of direct civilian casualties from bombing in addition to cholera outbreaks, starvation, and other natural disasters incurred during wartime. The United States provides nearly 60% of Saudi Arabia’s armaments.

Even the president’s staunchest allies, however, joined the call in condemning Saudi Arabia for what’s seen as reckless behavior by the young Prince Salman. Following Trump’s dismissive comments regarding whether or not the Crown Prince had a hand in the assassination of Khashoggi, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) voted in favor of the Senate resolution after signaling that he would cast a vote against it. “I changed my mind because I’m pissed,” said Graham.

Thanks for being here and being a loyal reader. The American Media Institute covers stories other news outlets do not. We recruit reporters all over the world, investing money in translators, travel and document research. We are not a blog, which has few expenses beyond pajamas. Please help us continue to provide hard-hitting journalism by making a tax-deductible contribution today. Thank you.